Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 18:02:41 04/07/98
Go up one level in this thread
>I tested about 30-40 different CST versions, including the Paris >versions (plural!) and both version that were released afterwards. I >didn't test all versions against Genius, but it was the most reliable >nightmare for CST; even the version which got 50% vs. Rebel 8 lost >horrible vs. Genius 5. I cannot confirm those results. Chris had 5 autoplayer pairs in his company. I have one pair at home. We correlated our results each day. We had good versions vs. Genius, good versions vs. Fritz, vs. Rebel and and and. Some versions were good against 3 from 5 enemies. Some against the other 2. We tried to find the UNIQUE version that kills ALL of them. But this was not possible. The good-mchess versions were bad against genius. And similar problems. I do not have the results Moritz had. This is one reason I don't see a problem in saying: I cannot confirm YOUR results. We had different results te whole time when we tested cstal, and we have different results while we test fritz5. Only god knows why. I still think the commercial CD version is the strongest version. Even if it plays many wins into draws it gets the best results IMO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.