Author: Robert Raese
Date: 01:44:13 04/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2001 at 04:22:35, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 29, 2001 at 03:22:08, Mark Schreiber wrote: > >>Why is there no poll on the Kramnik qualifying match between Fritz and Junior? >>A good poll question would be - >>Are the conditions for Kramnik qualifier tournament fair? >>The conditions are >>1) Kramnik gets the program months before the match. >>2) Only 2 computers competing. >>3) Programmers are not the operators. >>Possible answers are Yes or no? >>Does anybody think this fair? > >1)I doubt if 1 is going to happen. > >2)I think the joke is not good enough > >I suggest to add the following conditions: > >a)Kramnik can use computers to help him during the match. >b)Kramnik is going to get 4 hours per game when the program that plays against >him will get only 1 minute for all the game. >c)The moves of the program should be played on the board by operators and if the >operators are not fast enough then the program will lose on time. >d)Kramnik can choose the operators of the program. > >Uri well really... to make it fair you must also implement: e) kramnik will be able to see what moves the machine is thinking about. f) if at any time the machine's eval rises 300 centipawns above kramnik's, then the human shall have the option to abort the game. g) kramnik will be allowed two takebacks per game. these rules work fine for me when i play against chess tiger so i see no reason why this kind of fairness cannot be practiced with kramnik.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.