Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Mate to solve for champions...

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 05:36:44 04/29/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 29, 2001 at 07:32:15, leonid wrote:

>Hello!
>
>I know that I should never indicate here any position like this, but it is just
>too seductive! Only really dedicated man or highly performant mate solver can
>crunch it.
>
>[D]Qrbqkbr1/Qn3qPP/NQqQq1nB/1qNqQBq1/1Qq1q2Q/8/3RR3/4K3 w - -
>
>Please indicate your result.
>
>Thanks,
>Leonid.

Both Junior5.9 and chessmaster6000 believe that QxQ+ is an easy win.

They do not suggest the same move but the evaluation of Junior5.9 is +3.31 pawns
for white when the evaluation of chessmaster6000(ss=10) is +10.36 pawns for
white.

Junior5.9 says 1.Qexe6+ when Chessmaster6000(ss=10) says 1.Qbxd8+

Junior5.9 used 37 minutes and 11 seconds on p200 to get +3.31.
Chessmaster6000(ss=10) needed 14 minutes and 58 seconds on PIII450 to get the
+10.36.


Uri



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.