Author: Paul
Date: 05:46:37 04/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2001 at 08:36:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 29, 2001 at 07:32:15, leonid wrote: > >>Hello! >> >>I know that I should never indicate here any position like this, but it is just >>too seductive! Only really dedicated man or highly performant mate solver can >>crunch it. >> >>[D]Qrbqkbr1/Qn3qPP/NQqQq1nB/1qNqQBq1/1Qq1q2Q/8/3RR3/4K3 w - - >> >>Please indicate your result. >> >>Thanks, >>Leonid. > >Both Junior5.9 and chessmaster6000 believe that QxQ+ is an easy win. > >They do not suggest the same move but the evaluation of Junior5.9 is +3.31 pawns >for white when the evaluation of chessmaster6000(ss=10) is +10.36 pawns for >white. > >Junior5.9 says 1.Qexe6+ when Chessmaster6000(ss=10) says 1.Qbxd8+ > >Junior5.9 used 37 minutes and 11 seconds on p200 to get +3.31. >Chessmaster6000(ss=10) needed 14 minutes and 58 seconds on PIII450 to get the >+10.36. > > >Uri I think it's a mate in 12, but can't participate coz I'm no champion ... :( Groetjes, Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.