Author: leonid
Date: 16:51:19 04/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2001 at 18:45:05, Paul wrote: >On April 29, 2001 at 14:07:27, leonid wrote: > >>It could be so. Real number of moves I don't know. For sure, I can say that this >>is mate between 10 and 13 moves. If 12 moves, indicated by Paul, is not the >>guess but what really its program found, then it is mate in 10, 11 or 12 moves. > >No ... my program also found a mate in 13 ... just tried to have some fun :) > >WM13 10 Qbxd8+ Qxd8 Qhxd8+ Nxd8 Qxd8+ Qxd8 gxf8=Q+ Rxf8 Qxf7+ Rxf7 h8=Q+ Nf8 >Qxf8+ Rxf8 Rxd8+ Kxd8 Nxe6+ Bxe6 Bg5+ Kd7 Qe7+ Kc8 Qexb8+ Qxb8 Qxb8# > >>I found mate for sure by selective in 13 moves. My program also searched >>position as far as 9 moves and indicated that mate in 9 do not existe. This is >>from where I became certain that this position is not easy. Will try, if I will >>have the chance, with my 600Mhz to look even 10 moves deep. Expected time is >>around 18 hours. It is difficult when you don't have free laptop for this work! > >So ... until someone finds something better, we're both champions my friend! ;) Thanks, Paul, I am ready to make the company. Leonid. >Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.