Author: stuart taylor
Date: 01:52:40 04/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2001 at 00:30:58, Fernando Villegas wrote: >It is 00:30 hour in the morning and I am awfully tired, so I will post the game >tomorrow morning with the comments, details, jokes and all the fun we got >together. What I can say to you by now is that it was a very very atacking wild >game. It seems that I setted Rodrigo "agressive" instead of gambit. The result? >Tiger won. See tomorrow - MY tomorrow- how it was... And what a wine!!!! Yeah, >anyway I opened the bottle to consolate my friend. > >Fernando Villegas Why did the human allow the wildness? Is it any wonder that a GM would lose? (By the way, I tried an informal game against Rebel Tiger 13 recently, with Stonewall, and Tiger seemed to be extremely anti-human and ingenious compared to other programs I've played. The result is obvious, but the way of getting there seemed to be far far superior, so I'm not surprised that it is a tough program for GMs. It looks like DJ might be coming out high, but I don't see any proof if it is better than Tiger. I only don't understand why Tiger sometimes still loses. p.s. I might not be posting as much as I do, much longer, because I don't see much reaction to my many questions, ideas and way of thinking.(Idon't mean this post) S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.