Author: stuart taylor
Date: 02:26:43 04/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2001 at 03:30:03, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 30, 2001 at 03:02:31, Christophe Theron wrote: ><snipped> >>I mention this problem because dispite being officially 20 times slower, Junior >>managed to reach a ply depth which is consistent with the next moves. So maybe >>the problem comes from the clock. > >I believe that the fact that Junior could reach similiar depth to the next moves >is partly because of learning from previous moves thanks to the hash tables and >partly because of the fact that it was also significantly slower in move 38(only >302 knodes/second) and used only 22 seconds at move 39. > >I remember that Junior could get depthes that are bigger than 17 at moves 36-37 >and if I remember correctly it could reach even depth 19. > >Uri So you are saying that 53 NPS should have been enough not to have made the error because of it, as most of the analysis would have still been in the hash. So what's the problem? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.