Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:31:59 04/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2001 at 05:26:43, stuart taylor wrote: >On April 30, 2001 at 03:30:03, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 30, 2001 at 03:02:31, Christophe Theron wrote: >><snipped> >>>I mention this problem because dispite being officially 20 times slower, Junior >>>managed to reach a ply depth which is consistent with the next moves. So maybe >>>the problem comes from the clock. >> >>I believe that the fact that Junior could reach similiar depth to the next moves >>is partly because of learning from previous moves thanks to the hash tables and >>partly because of the fact that it was also significantly slower in move 38(only >>302 knodes/second) and used only 22 seconds at move 39. >> >>I remember that Junior could get depthes that are bigger than 17 at moves 36-37 >>and if I remember correctly it could reach even depth 19. >> >>Uri > >So you are saying that 53 NPS should have been enough not to have made the error >because of it, as most of the analysis would have still been in the hash. >So what's the problem? >S.Taylor I did not say it. part of the analysis was on the hash but I did not say that most of it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.