Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Gambit 2 and hash tables

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 10:45:29 04/30/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 30, 2001 at 12:03:54, Feivel Avrum wrote:

>On April 29, 2001 at 13:31:51, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>This behaviour is absolutely normal.
>>
>>What you need to know is that the decrease in NPS coming from bigger hash tables
>>is widely offset by the decrease in the size of the tree.
>>
>>As a result, the NPS goes down, but the playing strength still goes up.
>>
>>If you try with 24Kb (not Mb) of HT, you will see an even better NPS, but of
>>course the program will be MUCH weaker.
>
>Christophe,
>
>I understand your answer but I wonder why on a machine with 256 Meg RAM a hash
>of 24 Meg seems to be the "turn around" point. Is this "point" common to most
>programs or is it just coincidental?
>
>Feivel



It is a "turn around" point because you have taken it as reference!

Take any other point as reference, and it will look like a turn around point!



    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.