Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kramnik interview

Author: Don Prohaska

Date: 12:15:37 04/30/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 30, 2001 at 10:15:16, Uri Blass wrote:

>On April 30, 2001 at 10:01:09, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On April 30, 2001 at 07:22:24, Alvaro Polo wrote:
>>
>>>Hello all,
>>>
>>>In a recent interview Kramnik states that "We are in a very interesting phase,
>>>when the strength of the best GMs and that of the best chess engines run by the
>>>best processors are about equal."
>>>
>>>I know that this point (machines being GM strenght or nor) has been debated
>>>again and again and I don't intend to post a troll. I would just like to know if
>>>the consensus now among chess programmers is wether Kramnik is right or not. For
>>>instance, I remember Bob Hyatt saying that computers are really 2450, etc. But
>>>software evolves, CPU power evolves and perhaps now there is agreement that
>>>machines are finally GM strenght?
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>Alvaro Polo
>>
>>
>>I personally think my estimate is still pretty close.  Computers have two
>>serious problems:
>>
>>1.  opening books.  They depend on a human to "play the game" of choosing good
>>and bad openings.  This leaves them highly vulnerable to opening preparation and
>>traps.  Particularly when you practice against one copy and then play another
>>copy which doesn't have the 'learning' from the practice games.
>
>I think it is unfair to use this way to decide about the level of chess
>programs.
>
>I am more interested to know the results of programs when the opponent cannot
>get a copy of the program.
>
>When Deep thought and Deep blue played against humans the opponents could not
>get a copy of the program so I see no reason to let them to get a copy of the
>programs before the game.
>
>I think that letting the opponent to get a copy before the match should be
>allowed only after programs can prove that they can beat the best humans without
>giving them a copy before the match.
>
>Uri

I've learned not to get into this stuff, but if the computer gets a copy of the
human (all his published games)why is it bad  for the human not to get a peek at
the computer? I know!  I should mind my own business.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.