Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 00:31:11 05/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2001 at 15:26:30, A.L.Mourik wrote:
>GT 2.0 easy to hold even with antihuman-agressive settings
>
>As more or less promised, I would come back on my opinion about level of play of
>gambit tiger 2(GT2) against me as not all to strong human player.
>I have a rating of 1868 Elo and I play often blitz games against various progs.
>As earlier stated here in CCC, I noticed that I have much less problems against
> Gambit Tiger than against other progs such as Fritz, Rebel Century or even
>Crafty.
>The author recommended me than to play it in antihuman, agressive style
>settings. Thus so I did.
>And here are my results so far.
>Of course I still loose 9 out of 10, but still I must say that GT2 is much more
>easy to draw or even beat than the herefore named other progs.
>And though antihuman-agressive playing style is more entertaining than normal
>setting it is not more difficult for me to play against.
>
>In my last game i noticed very strange anti positional moves as for example
>move 13 b3? in the game below.
> I included some longer thinking analysis of GT2, so that you can see that only
>after 6;51 GT2 changes to a little bit better move 13 Bb1. Fritz6 even not in
>his best 10 best mode, would play this move.
>
>[D]1rbq1rk1/4npbp/ppnpp1p1/2p5/P3PP2/2NP1NP1/BPP4P/R1B1QRK1 w - - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Fritz 6:
>
>1. ³ (-0.41): 12.Qf2 d5 13.e5 Bb7 14.d4 cxd4 15.Nxd4 Nxd4 16.Qxd4 f6
>2. ³ (-0.44): 12.Rf2 d5 13.e5 Bb7 14.Bd2 Nb4 15.Bb3 Nf5 16.Be3
>3. ³ (-0.47): 12.Qe2 Nd4 13.Qf2 f5 14.Nxd4 cxd4 15.Ne2 Nc6 16.c3 dxc3
>4. ³ (-0.53): 12.g4 Nb4 13.Bb3 Nec6 14.Qf2 Na5 15.Ba2 Nxa2 16.Rxa2 Qf6
>5. ³ (-0.44): 12.Bd2 Qd7 13.Qd1 f5 14.Re1 Nb4 15.Bc4 Rf6
>6. ³ (-0.44): 12.Qd2 f5 13.Re1 Nd4 14.Nxd4 cxd4 15.Nb1 Qe8 16.a5
>7. ³ (-0.47): 12.Qd1 Nd4 13.Ne2 Nxf3+ 14.Rxf3 f5 15.Re3 fxe4 16.dxe4 Qc7
>8. ³ (-0.47): 12.h3 Nd4 13.Qf2 f5 14.a5 b5 15.e5 Nxf3+ 16.Qxf3
>9. ³ (-0.47): 12.Be3 Qd7 13.Qf2 f5 14.Ng5 Rf6 15.Rae1 Bb7
>10. ³ (-0.50): 12.Kg2 Nd4 13.Qf2 f5 14.Nxd4 cxd4 15.Ne2 Nc6 16.c3
>
>(Mourik, Sommelsdijk 30.04.2001)
>
>And for IMO obvious reasons because, white volontarily closes in his bishop with
>13. b3.
>
>
>[Event "5 min blitz + 3 sec."]
>[Site "home on a PII 400 Mhz"]
>[Date "2001.04.30"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Gambit Tiger 2.0, antihuman-agressive"]
>[Black "Bram Mourik, 'anti computer style'"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ECO "B23"]
>[Annotator "closed in bishop theme, gambittiger"]
>[PlyCount "174"]
>[EventDate "2001.04.30"]
>
>1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 d6 3. f4 Nc6 4. Nf3 g6 5. Bc4 Bg7 6. O-O e6 7. d3 Nge7 8. Qe1
>a6 9. a4 Rb8 10. g3 b6 11. Ba2 O-O 12. b3
>
>{ 00:01:56.8 -0,20 12ply 8773842 b3 f5 Bb1 d5 Bb2 Nd4 a5 fxe4 dxe4 b5
>e5 Nxf3+ Rxf3 Bb7 Rd3; 00:04:33.3 -0,28 13ply 21120095; b3 f5 Bb1 d5 Bb2 Nd4 Kg2
>Nxf3 Rxf3 d4 Nd1 Bb7 Qe2 Qd7 ; 00:06:51.5 -0,22 13ply 31840135; Bb1 f5 Nd1 d5 e5
>d4 Ng5 Qe8 c4 Na5 Bc2 h6 Nf3}
>
>13. .. Re8 13. Bb1 d5 14. Bb2 d4 15. Ne2 e5
>16. fxe5 Nxe5 17. Nxe5 Bxe5 18. a5 b5 19. Bc1 Qd6 20. Qf2 Rf8 21. Bh6 Bg7 22.
>Bxg7 Kxg7 23. Nf4 b4 24. Qf3 Be6 25. h3 Qd7 26. Rf2 Rh8 27. g4 Rbf8 28. Qg3 h5
>29. gxh5 Rh6 30. Ba2 Kh7 31. Kh1 gxh5 32. Qf3 Ng6 33. Rg1 Nxf4 34. Qxf4 Bxh3
>35. Rg3 Bg4 36. Rgg2 Qd6 37. Qxd6 Rxd6 38. Rg3 Rg6 39. Rg1 Be6 40. Bb1 Rxg1+
>41. Kxg1 Rg8+ 42. Kh2 Rb8 43. Kg3 Rb5 44. e5 Rxa5 45. Kh4 Ra1 46. Rf1 Kh6 47.
>Rf6+ Kg7 48. Rf1 Bg4 49. Kg5 a5 50. Re1 a4 51. bxa4 Rxa4 52. Rh1 Ra1 53. Rg1
>Kf8 54. Rf1 Ke7 55. Rg1 Be6 56. Kxh5 Ba2 57. Bxa2 Rxg1 58. Bb3 Re1 59. e6 Rxe6
>60. Kg4 Re5 61. Kf4 f6 62. Ba4 Kd6 63. Kf3 Re3+ 64. Kf4 Re1 65. Bb3 Rb1 66. Ba4
>Ra1 67. Bb3 Ra3 68. Ke4 Rxb3 69. cxb3 Ke6 70. Kf3 Kf5 71. Kg3 Kg5 72. Kf3 f5
>73. Kg3 f4+ 74. Kf3 Kf5 75. Kf2 Kg4 76. Ke2 f3+ 77. Kf2 Kf4 78. Ke1 Ke3 79. Kf1
>Kxd3 80. Kf2 Ke4 81. Kg3 d3 82. Kg4 d2 83. Kg3 d1=Q 84. Kf2 Qe2+ 85. Kg3 Qg2+
>86. Kh4 Kf4 87. Kh5 Qg5# 0-1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.