Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kramnik interview

Author: Djordje Vidanovic

Date: 08:12:12 05/01/01

Go up one level in this thread


On April 30, 2001 at 10:59:03, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On April 30, 2001 at 10:29:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On April 30, 2001 at 10:01:09, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On April 30, 2001 at 07:22:24, Alvaro Polo wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hello all,
>>>>
>>>>In a recent interview Kramnik states that "We are in a very interesting phase,
>>>>when the strength of the best GMs and that of the best chess engines run by the
>>>>best processors are about equal."
>>>>
>>>>I know that this point (machines being GM strenght or nor) has been debated
>>>>again and again and I don't intend to post a troll. I would just like to know if
>>>>the consensus now among chess programmers is wether Kramnik is right or not. For
>>>>instance, I remember Bob Hyatt saying that computers are really 2450, etc. But
>>>>software evolves, CPU power evolves and perhaps now there is agreement that
>>>>machines are finally GM strenght?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>Alvaro Polo
>>>
>>>
>>>I personally think my estimate is still pretty close.  Computers have two
>>>serious problems:
>>>
>>>1.  opening books.  They depend on a human to "play the game" of choosing good
>>>and bad openings.  This leaves them highly vulnerable to opening preparation and
>>>traps.  Particularly when you practice against one copy and then play another
>>>copy which doesn't have the 'learning' from the practice games.
>>>
>>>2.  blocked positions and slow build-ups in kingside attacks.  Hardly anyone
>>>has made progress in fighting either of these problems.  And they _still_ offer
>>>good chances for a GM that is willing to employ them.
>>
>>I completely agree here. Add to that that if you can remember which program
>>you practiced against cq studied very well, that you then also know what
>>kind of positoinal knowledge the prog doesn't know.
>>
>>Some progs lack simplistic positional knowledge. Playing progs in general
>>is not such a cool idea, you need to know indepth knowledge of the program
>>you play to win from it.
>>
>>At least with 2285 national i need to know that.
>
>Do you want to play a match Vincent :-)
>
>Ed


I'd be willing to wager a bet in Vincent's favour :-)  He would be my favourite
in a 4 game match vs Rebel.  Other conditions:  40 moves in 20 hrs, the rest in
30 min.

***  Djordje



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.