Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 09:44:07 05/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 01, 2001 at 12:24:43, Aaron Tay wrote: >On May 01, 2001 at 10:59:48, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On May 01, 2001 at 10:49:01, John Smith wrote: >> >>>Fischer was one of the strongest players in history; why shouldn't he be a >>>proper subject of discussion, notwithstanding his views? >> >> >>Unless there was an outstanding revelation, beyond the oft repeated belief by >>his most ardent fans that he would beat everyone in sight and crush them to >>little pieces after he had stomped them to a pulp, I fail to see the relevance >>with this group. For example, I don't see anything on Tal, Smyslov, or Alekhine >>(other than references to positions or games), which is just as well, as it >>would have very little to do with the proposed subject matter of this message >>board. So I don't see why Bobby, however wonderful his stomping techniques may >>have been, would be an exception to this. >> >> Albert > >Would Bobby Fischer today be crushed by Fritz7? If it were a full palette, dropped from a height of 400 meters.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.