Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:19:51 05/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 01, 2001 at 12:18:47, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On May 01, 2001 at 10:40:06, Chessfun wrote: > >>On May 01, 2001 at 10:33:01, Rajen Gupta wrote: >> >>>after drawing 12-12 with junior. fritz is now leading in the play-off 2-0. dont >>>know what sort of play off this is or how long.in my opinion the 2 prog should >>>now be allowed to beat up other progs (and find which one does it more >>>effectively) or submit the games to a panel of expert human GMs to get their >>>opinion as to which of the 2 plays more human-like!and has better chances of >>>winning aginst a human super gm >>> >>>rajen >> >>According to Chessbase www.chessbase.com the play-off is over Fritz won. >> >>Sarah. > >Did this prove scientifically which is the best program? Was the luck factor >removed? Is the result more significant than the WCCC? Scientifically it proves nothing but I believe that Fritz is better based on the results. I guess that the Junior team made better opening preperation(I guess that Junior trained a lot against Deep Fritz before the match in order to choose positions that Deep Fritz does not understand). It worked perfectly in the first 5 games and Junior was leading 5-0 but later Deep Fritz learned and the best engine won. I guess that the Fritz team is bad at opening preperation and this is the reason that they usually do not get first place in tournaments but they have the best engine. It is only speculation and I may be wrong. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.