Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:42:24 05/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 01, 2001 at 15:30:26, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On May 01, 2001 at 12:18:47, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On May 01, 2001 at 10:40:06, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On May 01, 2001 at 10:33:01, Rajen Gupta wrote: >>> >>>>after drawing 12-12 with junior. fritz is now leading in the play-off 2-0. dont >>>>know what sort of play off this is or how long.in my opinion the 2 prog should >>>>now be allowed to beat up other progs (and find which one does it more >>>>effectively) or submit the games to a panel of expert human GMs to get their >>>>opinion as to which of the 2 plays more human-like!and has better chances of >>>>winning aginst a human super gm >>>> >>>>rajen >>> >>>According to Chessbase www.chessbase.com the play-off is over Fritz won. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>Did this prove scientifically which is the best program? Was the luck factor >>removed? > >Yes, the element of luck had been removed to a very high degree. At least for >those programs which did not participate in this play-off. > >Uli :) Suppose it had been a 22 game match. or a 30 game match. Care to wager who would have won? The closer two programs are, the more it becomes a "coin toss". You get a better idea when a bunch of programs play in a tournament rather than two programs in a basement match. > >> Is the result more significant than the WCCC? >> >>bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.