Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 17:41:07 05/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 01, 2001 at 20:29:13, Chessfun wrote: >On May 01, 2001 at 19:58:19, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On May 01, 2001 at 19:44:24, José Berdiñas Bonefua wrote: >> >>>On May 01, 2001 at 18:20:08, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >>> >>>>After Roland Pfister's superb effort to provide the adapter for Shredder to >>>>operate under the Fritz GUI, I have decided to try it out. I played three >>>>matches between Shredder 5 and a. Deep Fritz; b. Crafty 18.08 and c. Gambit >>>>Tiger 2.0. Shredder did exceptionally well, bearing in mind the fact that it >>>>ran through a software contraption that could actually weaken it. >>>> >>>>The conditions: game in 3 (sudden death), 16MB hash, self made book (unified), >>>>1Ghz Athlon, 256MB RAM, Win 2000 >>>> >>>>The scores: >>>> >>>>Shredder 5 vs Deep Fritz 8-16 >>>>Shredder 5 vs Crafty 1.08 16-8 >>>>Shredder 5 vs Gambit Tiger 2.0 13-11 >>>> >>>> >>>>Rgds, >>>> >>>>*** Djordje >>> >>> >>>What is the speed of Shredder 5 for you? . >>>For my computer Shredder 5 in chessbase interface run 40% of the speed compared >>>to Shredder interface. >>> >>>José >> >>Hi, >> >>compare the time for test suits, not np/s! >>Time is ~ = not the np/s! >> >>Best >>Frank > >Thanks for that info Frank. >I myself wondered about the NPS which I thought was down >maybe 20%. Have you tried it yourself?. > >Sarah. Hello Sarah, Manfred Meiler wrote about results in different German fora. Manfred compare the original version with the adapter version for Chess-Base GUIs. People wrote about a ponder problem in German fora. Roland will check this and have a to do list. But I think at the moment Shredder works fine with the adapter from Roland Pfister. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.