Author: stuart taylor
Date: 17:59:53 05/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 01, 2001 at 20:25:12, Chessfun wrote: >On May 01, 2001 at 12:54:38, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On May 01, 2001 at 12:18:47, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On May 01, 2001 at 10:40:06, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On May 01, 2001 at 10:33:01, Rajen Gupta wrote: >>>> >>>>>after drawing 12-12 with junior. fritz is now leading in the play-off 2-0. dont >>>>>know what sort of play off this is or how long.in my opinion the 2 prog should >>>>>now be allowed to beat up other progs (and find which one does it more >>>>>effectively) or submit the games to a panel of expert human GMs to get their >>>>>opinion as to which of the 2 plays more human-like!and has better chances of >>>>>winning aginst a human super gm >>>>> >>>>>rajen >>>> >>>>According to Chessbase www.chessbase.com the play-off is over Fritz won. >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>>Did this prove scientifically which is the best program? Was the luck factor >>>removed? Is the result more significant than the WCCC? >>> >>>bruce >> >> >>The "play-off" should be (and for crying out loud-could someone PLEASE get them >>to do this, or something similar. What's the point of just the idea?) that both >>DJ and DF should play a short match each with one, or both Tigers. Or a >>different top program, as that would be more entertaining as well as more >>scientific and informative in its testing. >> Scientifically, as an experiment, it is much too close to decide from. But >>that doesn't necesarily mean that one isn't stronger than the other. >> So by testing both against Tiger(s) you will see if one clearly handles Tiger >>better than the other. AND you might even see that Tiger itself looks better >>than both. >> If you must, do it with Shredder 5, OR, also with Shredder. >>S.Taylor > > >The SSDF is currently testing Gambit 2.0 v Deep Fritz. >Deep Fritz I believe is winning 13-11 >last post I saw was this; >http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?167133 >That is on equal hardware. >But even so what would be the point in your proposal when >the program that plays Kramnik will use 8 cpu's? > >Sarah. Oh! if that's the case it would be different. So should this test match have been. (8 cpu's should add atleast a ply). S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.