Author: Chessfun
Date: 10:42:30 05/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2001 at 13:28:13, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On May 02, 2001 at 11:37:32, Chessfun wrote: > >> >>All games played in Deep Fritz interface with ponder=off. >>Time control 60/3 game, 10 rounds, 64 mb hash tables each. >>All programs with their original opening books optimized. >>All 3, 4 and 5 men tablebases. Thunderbird at 945 mhz. >> >>Fritz 6 is from 6/12/2000 so called "e". >> >>First 4 make the playoffs. >> >>280/280 >> >>1) Deep Fritz 42.0/70 1413.75 >>2) Gambit 2.0 42.0/70 1405.00 >>3) Tiger 14.0 40.0/70 >>4) Hiarcs 7.32 33.5/70 >>5) Junior 6a 33.0/70 >>6) Deep Junior 32.5/70 >>7) Fritz 6 30.0/70 >>8) Nimzo 8 27.0/70 >> >>Play-Offs. >>Best of Ten 60/3 autoplayed, ponder=on. >>If tied refer to tournament match score. >>If still tied refer to tournament position. >> >>Play-off (1) >>Deep Fritz +3 -1 =5 >>Hiarcs 7.32 +1 -3 =5 >> >>Play-off (2) >>Gambit 2.0 +2 -1 =7 >>Tiger 14.0 +1 -2 =7 >> >>Final. >>Deep Fritz +0 -3 =5 >>Gambit 2.0 +3 -0 =5 >> >>Gambit 2.0 Wins. >> >>Sarah. > >Thanks Sarah, interesting tourney ! > >Best >Frank > >PS: >I believe Deep Fritz is with one CPU stronger then Fritz 6a. OK not in my CCE >tourney but I have here only 1.700 games. I also believe it is stronger on one cpu. The Fritz 6 so called "e" (English) from 12/16/2000 is clearly weaker IMO than the original "a" version. Fritz 6 has dominated my tournaments for over a year. Next I will not use the "e" version just the "a". Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.