Author: John Dahlem
Date: 14:19:19 05/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2001 at 16:48:09, Ingo Bauer wrote: >On May 02, 2001 at 16:02:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 02, 2001 at 08:16:34, Ingo Bauer wrote: >> >>>Hello Graham >>> >>>On May 02, 2001 at 07:50:21, Graham Laight wrote: >>> >>>>* send a copy of the commercial version of Deep Fritz to Kramnik. Why not? He >>>>can very easily obtain a copy anyway - so sending it will do no harm. Meanwhile, >>>>you can work on the REAL program that's ACTUALLY going to play him! >>> >>>>you must win fairly - you can't risk your reputation >>> >>>Do you think that these two points fit together? >>> >>>Regards >>>Ingo >> >> >>I suppose it depends on your definition of "fair". >> >>:) >> >>Sounds good to me of course... > >Hi > >I don't want to discuss how the Kramnik vs. Computer Match was aranged. I do not >like it at all. But they have a contract with a certain meaning. If i see the >meaning (spirit, sorry my english) i think that giving not the final engine IS >unfair. > >Ingo I very very much disagree. Getting the final engine is unfair. You are giving the best player in the world 3 months to play as much as he wants against EXACTLY what he will be going up against. That is incredibly unfair. Kramnik I think will crush it under such conditions unless the Fritz team does something sneaky. John
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.