Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 14:20:47 05/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2001 at 13:42:30, Chessfun wrote: >On May 02, 2001 at 13:28:13, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On May 02, 2001 at 11:37:32, Chessfun wrote: >> >>> >>>All games played in Deep Fritz interface with ponder=off. >>>Time control 60/3 game, 10 rounds, 64 mb hash tables each. >>>All programs with their original opening books optimized. >>>All 3, 4 and 5 men tablebases. Thunderbird at 945 mhz. >>> >>>Fritz 6 is from 6/12/2000 so called "e". >>> >>>First 4 make the playoffs. >>> >>>280/280 >>> >>>1) Deep Fritz 42.0/70 1413.75 >>>2) Gambit 2.0 42.0/70 1405.00 >>>3) Tiger 14.0 40.0/70 >>>4) Hiarcs 7.32 33.5/70 >>>5) Junior 6a 33.0/70 >>>6) Deep Junior 32.5/70 >>>7) Fritz 6 30.0/70 >>>8) Nimzo 8 27.0/70 >>> >>>Play-Offs. >>>Best of Ten 60/3 autoplayed, ponder=on. >>>If tied refer to tournament match score. >>>If still tied refer to tournament position. >>> >>>Play-off (1) >>>Deep Fritz +3 -1 =5 >>>Hiarcs 7.32 +1 -3 =5 >>> >>>Play-off (2) >>>Gambit 2.0 +2 -1 =7 >>>Tiger 14.0 +1 -2 =7 >>> >>>Final. >>>Deep Fritz +0 -3 =5 >>>Gambit 2.0 +3 -0 =5 >>> >>>Gambit 2.0 Wins. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>Thanks Sarah, interesting tourney ! >> >>Best >>Frank >> >>PS: >>I believe Deep Fritz is with one CPU stronger then Fritz 6a. OK not in my CCE >>tourney but I have here only 1.700 games. > >I also believe it is stronger on one cpu. >The Fritz 6 so called "e" (English) from 12/16/2000 is clearly weaker >IMO than the original "a" version. Fritz 6 has dominated my tournaments >for over a year. Next I will not use the "e" version just the "a". The "a", is that the one from 04/09/2000 ? Sune > >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.