Author: Paul
Date: 17:33:48 05/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2001 at 20:12:09, leonid wrote:
>I asked you this because I expected that this time you went by brute force since
>this position is 10 moves deep. So, your result is 100% right. You have good
>program!
Thanks!
>This position happened to have very accessible branching factor for brute force.
>To my surprise, it took only 38 min 25 sec to say that mate in 9 do not existe.
>With hash at work it could be even shorter.
>
>I solved this position, just like you, by 10 moves selective search.
You changed something in your brute force program recently, right? How much did
that speed you up? Just curious!
>Paul, do you have, by accident, Web address of Genius 2 ("free Uri's version).
>Something happened to mine when I wanted to see this position on Genius 2. I use
>Genius 2 (Genius 4 I have) because I remember that it was without any bugs in
>mate solving and because Rebel 10 have limit of 100 moves. Meantime, will try to
>see if address is still here in Chess Club old pages.
I think it's this address: http://www.gambitchess.com/progr.htm
Groetjes,
Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.