Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 03:38:20 05/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2001 at 06:13:31, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On May 03, 2001 at 05:46:09, Larry Proffer wrote: > >> >>Enrique was advising them (also Bertil), from Enrique's CC-list also possibly >>Thoralf. What was the advice, and why? What did they, as the brought in >>impartial experts, represent? > >Thoralf was included in the last minute debate between Schröder/Theron and >Enrique/BGN as some kind of "eyewitness". He didn't comment at all. He was >included by mr Schroeder and I think it was ok. This is not correct Bertil, check your mail-box. It was Enrique who added Bryon Jacobs and Raymond Keene of BGN to the discussion group. The original discussion started between you, Thoralf, Enrique and me to warn you not to dedicate the good name of the SSDF to the BGN event as a stamp of trustworthiness. Then Enrique added the names of the BGN people and you were caught. I can not believe the stupidity to bring such issues up and then not have your facts straight. Ed >The so called impartial experts should recommend the "best" programs not all >programs in the world that in theory can be better. In April I believed that it >was Fritz, Junior, Shredder and Tiger(s) (alphabtical order). I don't believe it >is a coincidence that the best programs ARE commercial. Ferret could have been >an option but the programmer has made the impression that his program hasn't >been developed for a long time. I am sure all four programs above has improved a >lot in the last year or so. > >Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.