Author: Steven Schwartz
Date: 20:35:26 04/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 1998 at 17:24:41, Detlef Pordzik wrote: >On April 10, 1998 at 09:39:29, Steven Schwartz wrote: > >>On April 10, 1998 at 09:18:21, Rajen Gupta wrote: >> >>>I tend to agree with you. i think however that all the main charges >>>against Fritz5 as well as their rebuttal should be laid out on the CCC >>>so that people can have an idea as to why they have been asked to vote >>>specially on this occasion and not on previous occasions.i remember that >>>rebel8/P90 and hiarcs6/P200 were also leading by huge margins initially. >>> >>>Rajen gupta >> >>We agree again... Actually it would be ideal if someone who >>has been following the Fritz 5/SSDF issue would summarize >>the views from both sides. Then the proponents of both sides >>can chime in with their views on whether the summary was >>accurate and why. Any volunteers? > >You could answer me a simple question, dear Steven : >using which preferences did you mail the readers / users concerning this >upcoming vote ?? >I just ask, because I persoanlly received - nothing ; not even, after >having >emailed this to " yourmove-ect ". >I don't see a reason - but if your group wishes to handle me as a >persona non >grata - I can't help it ; >elsewise I'd recommend the same respect towards my person as to the rest >- if you can agree herein. >If not - let me know - I'll logoff within 12 hours time - at your serve, >sir ! > >ELVIS Hi EL, I promise you that you were not left out on purpose. I am currently in Massachusetts and I have no access to the email notification of the vote, but perhaps someone here can reprint it on the CCC. When I get back to my office in New York, I will personally send you the email. - Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.