Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 02:05:26 04/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 1998 at 04:31:56, Mats Winther wrote: < snip> >The thing is that Fritz5 doesn't understand that Na5 ruins the position >since the pawn chain is wrecked. Fritz5 has to count all the way to the >pawn loss before he understands that the move is bad. Any human can see >that -Na5 is equal to resigning the game. Why do you ignore the game I posted where Fritz demonstrated vs. Hiarcs 6 that Na5 was no fatal blunder?
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.