Author: Paul
Date: 15:57:26 05/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2001 at 18:41:05, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 03, 2001 at 18:37:08, John Dahlem wrote: > >>I had for awhile thought HIARCS 7.32 was considered easily the best, but then I >>read a summary from Cadaques 2000 and it seemed to be thought HIARCS was even >>somewhat dumb positonally. So, what do you think? HIARCS, Shredder 5, Tiger 14, >>Junior 6? > >According to one test suite: >http://home.interact.se/~w100107/fentest.htm > >These are the top ten: >AnMon 5.07 AMD K6-2 450 >SOS AMD K6-2 450 >Rebel 10b AMD K6-2 450 >Nimzo 3 P90 >Rebel Gambit II AMD K6-2 450 >Rebel Tiger 14 AMD K6-2 450 >Nimzo 3.5 P90 >Hiarcs 7.32 AMD K6-2 450 >Shredder 4 AMD K6-2 450 >Phalanx XXII AMD K6-2 450 Quite a coincidence ... I just mentioned this test in the CCR test thread. Somehow I think that that test is not very meaningful; I posted the results of my Pretz March last year (when it had very little positional knowledge) at 1 minute per position (iso the required 15'/p): Score: 129 (5 10 10 7 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 0 5 10 7) "Champion" Paul
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.