Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:00:07 05/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2001 at 18:57:26, Paul wrote: >On May 03, 2001 at 18:41:05, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On May 03, 2001 at 18:37:08, John Dahlem wrote: >> >>>I had for awhile thought HIARCS 7.32 was considered easily the best, but then I >>>read a summary from Cadaques 2000 and it seemed to be thought HIARCS was even >>>somewhat dumb positonally. So, what do you think? HIARCS, Shredder 5, Tiger 14, >>>Junior 6? >> >>According to one test suite: >>http://home.interact.se/~w100107/fentest.htm >> >>These are the top ten: >>AnMon 5.07 AMD K6-2 450 >>SOS AMD K6-2 450 >>Rebel 10b AMD K6-2 450 >>Nimzo 3 P90 >>Rebel Gambit II AMD K6-2 450 >>Rebel Tiger 14 AMD K6-2 450 >>Nimzo 3.5 P90 >>Hiarcs 7.32 AMD K6-2 450 >>Shredder 4 AMD K6-2 450 >>Phalanx XXII AMD K6-2 450 > >Quite a coincidence ... I just mentioned this test in the CCR test thread. > >Somehow I think that that test is not very meaningful; I posted the results of >my Pretz March last year (when it had very little positional knowledge) at 1 >minute per position (iso the required 15'/p): > >Score: 129 (5 10 10 7 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 0 5 10 7) > >"Champion" Paul Maybe your program really is the best positional program on earth. How does it do in the quiet moves in general? How does it do on LCT II?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.