Author: stuart taylor
Date: 16:26:03 05/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2001 at 18:41:05, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 03, 2001 at 18:37:08, John Dahlem wrote: > >>I had for awhile thought HIARCS 7.32 was considered easily the best, but then I >>read a summary from Cadaques 2000 and it seemed to be thought HIARCS was even >>somewhat dumb positonally. So, what do you think? HIARCS, Shredder 5, Tiger 14, >>Junior 6? > >According to one test suite: >http://home.interact.se/~w100107/fentest.htm > >These are the top ten: >AnMon 5.07 AMD K6-2 450 >SOS AMD K6-2 450 >Rebel 10b AMD K6-2 450 >Nimzo 3 P90 >Rebel Gambit II AMD K6-2 450 >Rebel Tiger 14 AMD K6-2 450 >Nimzo 3.5 P90 >Hiarcs 7.32 AMD K6-2 450 >Shredder 4 AMD K6-2 450 >Phalanx XXII AMD K6-2 450 Well, this is unfortunate because when you buy a top program, you get much less positional wisdom from it, than some of the programs which get much lower results on the ground. Shredder 5 went down from Shredder 4?!!!! Century, Fritz, Junior are not amongst the top positionally? so what ARE they? What's that I see in 5th place? does that say GT2? What! Really? almost as good as AnMon and SOS? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.