Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:40:23 05/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2001 at 19:05:26, Larry Proffer wrote: > >I didn't understand Hyatt's reply either. If Keene said yes (as reported by Ed) >then it is difficult to see what then stopped it. Keene must have known the >state of the contracts, and can hardly go making such statements in the face of >contract obligations to the contrary. You have to assume, therefore, that a >late(ish) Tiger entry was acceptable and not voiding of any other contracts, if >indeed other contracts were in place at that time. My reply was based on multiple comments posted here. That in order to delay Tiger's entry, the match between DF and DJ would have to take place first. I believe Enrique mentioned this and said it was not reasonable, or something to that effect. I didn't think Christophe or Ed had suggested this, but it seemed to be the only way to let Tiger arrive late _and_ meet the deadline Enrique was apparently under to get the challenger named...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.