Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 00:03:57 05/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 03, 2001 at 18:41:05, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 03, 2001 at 18:37:08, John Dahlem wrote: > >>I had for awhile thought HIARCS 7.32 was considered easily the best, but then I >>read a summary from Cadaques 2000 and it seemed to be thought HIARCS was even >>somewhat dumb positonally. So, what do you think? HIARCS, Shredder 5, Tiger 14, >>Junior 6? > >According to one test suite: >http://home.interact.se/~w100107/fentest.htm > >These are the top ten: >AnMon 5.07 AMD K6-2 450 >SOS AMD K6-2 450 >Rebel 10b AMD K6-2 450 >Nimzo 3 P90 >Rebel Gambit II AMD K6-2 450 >Rebel Tiger 14 AMD K6-2 450 >Nimzo 3.5 P90 >Hiarcs 7.32 AMD K6-2 450 >Shredder 4 AMD K6-2 450 >Phalanx XXII AMD K6-2 450 You can also check this test: http://home.bip.net/gunnar.blomstrand/topplista_64.htm This test is from the book "Spiel mit - gegen Grossmeister" by Emil Gelenczei. 64 games which all are judged. 1047 positions in 8 categories were every group gets 400 points. The idea is to see which program is best in analysing human games. The time is 40/2 3 min/move. The computer is a Celeron 450 with 128 cache and 64 MB. Program Rating Points 01 Gandalf 4.32f 2617 2120 02 Fritz 5.0 2591 2099 03 Gambit Tiger 1 2590 2098 04 Fritz 6.0 2585 2094 05 Junior 5.0 2571 2083 06 Rebel 10 2561 2075 07 Nimzo 2000 2560 2074 08 Chess Tiger 13 2540 2058 09 Zarkov 5.0 2536 2055 10 Genius 6.5 2529 2049 As you can see, the Rebel/Tiger programs is on both lists. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.