Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 10:29:15 04/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 1998 at 05:05:26, Moritz Berger wrote: >On April 11, 1998 at 04:31:56, Mats Winther wrote: > >< snip> > >>The thing is that Fritz5 doesn't understand that Na5 ruins the position >>since the pawn chain is wrecked. Fritz5 has to count all the way to the >>pawn loss before he understands that the move is bad. Any human can see >>that -Na5 is equal to resigning the game. > >Why do you ignore the game I posted where Fritz demonstrated vs. Hiarcs >6 that Na5 was no fatal blunder? Moritz, Moritz... What a materialist you are, always asking for facts, evidence, a-spiritual stuff. Once I commited the same crime and I was accused of not being religious... :) Enrique
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.