Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 05:41:47 05/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2001 at 06:53:26, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 04, 2001 at 03:50:13, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >>You can't mean that refering to our list make us involved? Then we are involved >>in many things ;-) > >Don't worry, I wasn't implying that. I was only trying to figure out what was >meant when writing the "international rating lists" in a paragraph devoted to >justification of the selection process. Mentioning your list as a possible >candidate was obvious to me. No further implication was intended. > >The problem, however, is that Bertil apparently made decisions based on the SSDF >list even though he should know the limitations of the list as a member. Acting >in contrast to the "expert" label. The assumption is that Bertil had a say in >the decision process, which strikes me as uncertain. I agree, I don't think Bertil was part of the decision process. And then your assumption, and problem, falls. About making a decision based on the list. My problem, however, is what limitations the list have which disqualify Bertil as an expert? Tony > >Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.