Author: Jeroen van Dorp
Date: 07:07:28 05/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
>The main problem with positional test is the fact that I doubt if the solutions >is correct. > >I think that there should be some proof that the solutions are correct(for >example comp-comp games from the positions after the right and comp-comp games >from positions after other computer moves). > >If I see that computer programs perform better after the solution move it may be >an evidence that the solution move is correct. > >I do not trust the impression of humans in a lot of cases. > ....some cases. Even I with my lousy chess knowledge outperform any chess engine in positional *analysis*, let alone strong chess players. Sometimes I distrust human impression. I never believe positional claims of chess engines :) J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.