Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:19:08 05/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2001 at 10:41:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: <snipped> >There are other possible explanations here too. > >The most likely is that the first search you gave produced a score for depth >16. It started on depth=17 but failed to produce a score/move before it timed >out. This explanation does not seem to be correct. The score of deeper blue was clearly lower after trading queens. It is known that programs after failing low use more time and I do not see that deeper blue used more time for Qxf1. It used only 168 seconds for Qxf1 based on the logfile. Another point is the fact that the score was no constant in the first iterations after Qxf1 Rxf1. I expect constant score in the first iterations if the score is based on previous search. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.