Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:10:59 05/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2001 at 13:41:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 04, 2001 at 13:33:55, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 04, 2001 at 13:20:51, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On May 04, 2001 at 10:52:52, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On May 03, 2001 at 21:03:58, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 03, 2001 at 18:51:08, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 12 54.72 -- 1. ... Qxa3 >>>>> 12 2:00 -3.04 1. ... Qxa3 2. Bf6 Rfd8 3. Bxd8 Rxd8 >>>>> 4. Rd1 Rd5 5. Qe4 g6 6. Qb4 Qa6 7. >>>>> Qf4 >>>>> 12-> 3:19 -3.04 1. ... Qxa3 2. Bf6 Rfd8 3. Bxd8 Rxd8 >>>>> 4. Rd1 Rd5 5. Qe4 g6 6. Qb4 Qa6 7. >>>>> Qf4 >>>>> 13 3:43 -- 1. ... Qxa3 >>>>> 13 5:06 0.00 1. ... Qxa3 2. Bf6 Rfc8 3. Bxg7 Kxg7 >>>>> 4. Qf6+ Kf8 5. Rf1 Rc7 6. Bg6 Re8 7. >>>>> Qh8+ Ke7 8. Qf6+ Kf8 >>>>> 13 11:27 ++ 1. ... b4!! >>>>> 13 13:05 -0.76 1. ... b4 2. cxb4 Qd5 3. Rf1 Rae8 4. >>>>> Bf2 f5 5. exf6 Qxg2 6. Bd4 Rf7 7. Bxa7 >>>>> Qd5 >>>>> 13 13:40 ++ 1. ... Rfe8!! >>>>> 13 14:40 -2.30 1. ... Rfe8 2. Rf1 Qf8 3. Qe4 g6 4. >>>>> Kb2 Rec8 5. Bf6 Rc7 6. Qf4 Rd7 7. h4 >>>>> a5 8. Be4 >>>>> 13 15:40 -2.63 1. ... Rfc8 2. Qe4 g6 3. Rf1 Qf8 4. >>>>> Kb2 Rc7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Bxb5 Rb8 7. g3 >>>>> Be4 >>>>> 13-> 16:21 -2.63 1. ... Rfc8 2. Qe4 g6 3. Rf1 Qf8 4. >>>>> Kb2 Rc7 5. Qg4 c5 6. Bxb5 Rb8 7. g3 >>>>> Be4 >>>>> time=16:39 cpu=100% mat=-3 n=596994678 fh=91% nps=597k >>>>> ext-> chk=29940411 cap=1174947 pp=514823 1rep=4254557 mate=419833 >>>>> predicted=0 nodes=596994678 evals=102285376 >>>>> endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 >>>>>Black(1): quit >>>>>execution complete. >>>> >>>> >>>>Mine looks a bit different on the quad. 2:18 to drop Qxa3. Note that I used >>>>hash=192M for the run... >>>> >>>> 12 38.66 -- 1. ... Qxa3 >>>> 12 1:27 -1.65 1. ... Qxa3 2. Bf6 Rfc8 3. Bxg7 Kxg7 >>>> 4. Qf6+ Kf8 5. Bg6 Rc7 6. Rf1 Re8 7. >>>> Qh8+ Ke7 8. Rxf7+ Kd8 9. Qxe8+ Kxe8 >>>> 10. Rxc7+ Kd8 11. Rxb7 Qxc3 12. Rxa7 >>>> Qxe5 >>>> 12 2:18 ++ 1. ... a5!! >>>> 12 3:39 -2.57 1. ... a5 2. Bf6 Rfc8 3. Qg4 Qf8 4. >>>> Qe4 g6 5. Kb2 Qc5 6. Rd1 Ra6 7. Qf4 >>>> 12 4:07 -2.58 1. ... Rfb8 2. Qe4 g6 3. Rf1 Qf8 4. >>>> Kb2 c5 5. Qg4 g5 6. Bf2 c4 7. Be2 >>>> (4) 12-> 4:18 -2.58 1. ... Rfb8 2. Qe4 g6 3. Rf1 Qf8 4. >>>> Kb2 c5 5. Qg4 g5 6. Bf2 c4 7. Be2 >>>> (3) 13 5:25 -2.52 1. ... Rfb8 2. Kb2 Rc8 3. Rf1 Rc7 4. >>>> Qe4 g6 5. Rxf7 Rxf7 6. Qxg6+ Kf8 7. >>>> Qxh6+ Kg8 8. Qg6+ Rg7 9. Qxe6+ Rf7 >>>> 13 7:40 -2.54 1. ... Rfc8 2. Rf1 Qf8 3. Qe4 g6 4. >>>> Kb2 Rc7 5. Bf6 c5 6. Qg4 c4 7. Be2 >>>> Rd7 8. h4 >>>> 13 8:00 -2.55 1. ... Rfe8 2. Kb2 Rab8 3. Rd1 Qf8 >>>> 4. Qe4 g6 5. Bf6 c5 6. Qg4 c4 7. Be2 >>>> Qc5 >>>> (3) 13-> 8:00 -2.55 1. ... Rfe8 2. Kb2 Rab8 3. Rd1 Qf8 >>>> 4. Qe4 g6 5. Bf6 c5 6. Qg4 c4 7. Be2 >>>> Qc5 >>>> >>>> >>>>I will have some 64-cpu alpha numbers in a month or two. Working on a port >>>>to use UPC right now... Compaq is loaning me a single-cpu alpha to compile/test >>>>on with the target of a 64 cpu machine they have. I will try to get it on to >>>>ICC on a weekend maybe... Or maybe for the next CCT. :) >>> >>>Prophecy: >>>You will win the next WCCC[*] >>> >>>[*] Unless someone else does the same port. There is no other machine that even >>>comes close. >> >>I am not so sure that it is enough to win. >>In the last 2 WCCC tournament the biggest hardware did not win. >> >>Deep thought failed to win in 1995(Fritz3 was the champion) >>Deep Junior,Deep Fritz,Ferret failed to win in 1999 and Shredder won. >> >>Uri > > >In the last two WCCC's there were no programs that were _really_ searching >at 60M nodes per second either. :) Yes but in the WCCC of 1995 Fritz was also clearly slower and I also believe in diminishing returns so 2M against 60M is not the same as 0.1M against 3M. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.