Author: Paul
Date: 12:55:08 05/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2001 at 15:51:07, leonid wrote: >On May 04, 2001 at 15:35:34, Paul wrote: > >>On May 04, 2001 at 15:28:48, leonid wrote: >> >>>On May 04, 2001 at 15:16:22, Angrim wrote: >>> >>>>On May 04, 2001 at 14:45:27, leonid wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi! >>>>> >>>>>Probably my previous position is too tough, then this (almost the same in >>>>>appearance) is very easy to solve. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>[D]RnqkqnR1/qBNbNBq1/QqQqQqQ1/BrQqQrB1/8/8/3P4/3K4 w - - >>>>> >>>>>Please indicate your result. >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>>Leonid. >>>> >>>>Man thats an ugly looking position :) >>>>proved that move e7xd5 wins, 6 turns >>>>took 3970678 evals, 107873 expands, 62 second on my Athlon650 using pn^2. >>>> >>>>I tried this with my "normal" search, and it couldn't search 2 ply deep in >>>>1 minute. the qsearch was totally killing it. >>> >>>I failed also twice on this position when tryed to put graphics for it. I even >>>went to see of your message was not that needy graphics. >>> >>>Leonid. >>> >>>>Angrim >> >>Hi! >> >>Your second rank is fawlty! It had just a P ... nothing more? Is this the right >>one? >> > >Thanks, Paul! Position is flawless. Now I can print it for later reference. > >Salut, >Leonid. In that case a solution is this following mate in 9: 01:32 WM9 08 Qcxd7+ Qcxd7 Rxb8+ Qxb8 Nc6+ Qd6xc6 Bxf6+ Rxf6 Qgxf6+ Qxf6 Q5xf6+ Qee7 Qexe7+ Kxc7 Bxb6+ Rxb6 Qaxb6# The other one took too long, so I stopped Pretz, sorry! ;) ciao, Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.