Author: leonid
Date: 13:07:19 05/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2001 at 15:55:08, Paul wrote: >On May 04, 2001 at 15:51:07, leonid wrote: > >>On May 04, 2001 at 15:35:34, Paul wrote: >> >>>On May 04, 2001 at 15:28:48, leonid wrote: >>> >>>>On May 04, 2001 at 15:16:22, Angrim wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 04, 2001 at 14:45:27, leonid wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Hi! >>>>>> >>>>>>Probably my previous position is too tough, then this (almost the same in >>>>>>appearance) is very easy to solve. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>[D]RnqkqnR1/qBNbNBq1/QqQqQqQ1/BrQqQrB1/8/8/3P4/3K4 w - - >>>>>> >>>>>>Please indicate your result. >>>>>> >>>>>>Thanks, >>>>>>Leonid. >>>>> >>>>>Man thats an ugly looking position :) >>>>>proved that move e7xd5 wins, 6 turns >>>>>took 3970678 evals, 107873 expands, 62 second on my Athlon650 using pn^2. >>>>> >>>>>I tried this with my "normal" search, and it couldn't search 2 ply deep in >>>>>1 minute. the qsearch was totally killing it. >>>> >>>>I failed also twice on this position when tryed to put graphics for it. I even >>>>went to see of your message was not that needy graphics. >>>> >>>>Leonid. >>>> >>>>>Angrim >>> >>>Hi! >>> >>>Your second rank is fawlty! It had just a P ... nothing more? Is this the right >>>one? >>> >> >>Thanks, Paul! Position is flawless. Now I can print it for later reference. >> >>Salut, >>Leonid. > >In that case a solution is this following mate in 9: Exact, Paul! Your program is just very good. Salut, Leonid. >01:32 WM9 08 Qcxd7+ Qcxd7 Rxb8+ Qxb8 Nc6+ Qd6xc6 Bxf6+ Rxf6 Qgxf6+ Qxf6 Q5xf6+ >Qee7 Qexe7+ Kxc7 Bxb6+ Rxb6 Qaxb6# > >The other one took too long, so I stopped Pretz, sorry! ;) > >ciao, >Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.