Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:12:09 04/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
>Again, I do need evidence before saying A better than B, etc. Before >saying someone is cheating I need evidence too. Not so eccentric, is it, >to claim that data is a required condition in any experimental field. > >Enrique It is known that decisions made by humans, also logical decisions, do request for emotional centres in the brain, before they were done. If you cut the way (clinical cases) to these emotional centres (or block them by a trauma) you cannot decide rational. You will decide logically, but irrational. You cannot interpet data without emotions. If you do so, you are not objective but crazy. There is no objectiveness. We all claim and interprete data. We all need data, thats true. But the data isn't OUT THERE. It comes using the minds. Or do you have a serial-interface in your body ?? Your minds cannot offer the brain the data to compute on it without emotions. Read Damasio or Kant to understand. If you believe that you could interpret data without changing them, if you believe you could objectively tell us about the world, than you are a) god and / or b) crazy.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.