Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:47:43 05/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2001 at 05:31:33, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On May 04, 2001 at 06:45:15, Ed Schröder wrote: >>You have understood well. But Enrique position is not unclear as you say >>because he gave his reasons a few days ago. Mistrust, indirectly calling >>Christophe and me a couple of liars. Making a quick statement here and then >>hide for the questions. >> >>Ed > >if enrique is doing so, he is maybe in an interest conflict. >he works for CB and works for other companies (BGN) too, >and it is about much money, and about fame and becoming a big >name in the game. > >He ISN'T independant. he is not objective. They present him >to be independant. they need "international experts from xyz" >they can control. cause it is not looking godd when THEY make >the propaganda themselves. > >And enrique has an interest not to allow YOU to take part in the >game, because he can this way take a revenge for that "you support thorsten" >and also for that christophe is forced to leave schroeder because >he could make more money with chessbase. I do not buy this theory. There is clearly a more simple explanation for the reason that Enrique had doubts about parallel version of tiger. Junior and Fritz are known for a long time as parallel programs when tiger is not known as a parallel program. This is probably the reason for the mistrust that Ed describes. > >enrique is the knife who cuts you into pieces. > >isn't this all a mean game ? I think that your words are too aggresive. Enrique is not a knife. Even if you can criticize his behaviour enrique did not kill people. Knife who cut you pieces is something that murders people. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.