Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:38:05 05/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2001 at 09:12:17, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 05, 2001 at 21:44:48, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On May 05, 2001 at 08:32:31, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>According to this performance rating of this match, the previous Deep Fritz had >>>a performance rating of 2683. If the newer version of Fritz 7 gain an additional >>>45 rating points in strength, plus the advantage of being able to use faster >>>hardware for the actual Kramnik match, then we could conclude that Fritz 7 could >>>well be rated over 2750. > >So at a 8 processor Xeon according to this PR nonsense it would >be rated like 3000 :) I do not see how did you get 3000 The 2683 performance of Fritz also was not tournament time control but at 1 hour/game. It is clear that Fritz like other known programs has no chance against kramnik and I do not see the point of playing against him. Deep Fritz is a known identity and I do not believe in the ability of chessbase to do big productive changes in Fritz after Deep Fritz. It will be more interesting to see Kramnik playing against a program that he even does not know the name of it when the program can be changed between the games when the only thing that he can know is that he is playing against a computer and that the organizers decided about the exact program that he plays before every game. These are the only conditions when a match against kramnik may be interesting. I believe that even at these condition the public will see kramnik as a favourite. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.