Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 08:46:21 04/12/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 1998 at 11:12:10, Thorsten Czub wrote: >So you don't count YEARS but MONTHS. Sorry, terrible confusion. Let's say 365.25 days. >Nimzo has made progress. This was caused due to many reasons. Hmmm... True... > The same >counts for Fritz5 IMO. Yup! > I don't think Fritz5 or Nimzo98 will dominate the >rest of the year. > >>Basically, Mchess 7 = >>Mchess 6 and Rebel 9 = Rebel 8. You got me. :) Better: the improvement from Mchess 6 to Mchess 7 and from Rebel 8 to Rebel 9 has not been as significant as the improvement from Nimzo 3.5 to Nimzo 98 or from Fritz 4 to Fritz 5. >>Instead, >>Nimzo 98 and Fritz 5 are quite a bit stronger than prior versions. > >Mumpitz ! Nimzo98 is stronger. Fritz5 has a special device and special >conditions that lead to a special ELO. If you put Fritz in a surrounding >like all the others have, it will get what it deserves. Yeah! Hang it! >Why e.g. was Fritz5 not that succesful in Eric Hallsworth manually >outplayed games ? Why Marc Young games have been so succesful? Mark? Are you autoplaying Fritz 5 or using a hidden engine? >Different people, different opinions. Very true. >BTW: between CSTal and Nimzo it is 3 wins for Tal, 1 draw. 0 losses. So Fritz 5 is stronger than Nimzo 98 and the SSDF is right? :) Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.