Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:43:29 05/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2001 at 10:58:01, Larry Proffer wrote: > >Thank you for your reply. I concur. > >What we do know is that Fritz and Junior are, to all intents and purposes >'equal', or very nearly 'equal'. > >If we need to find a winner, it makes *no* difference how many games we play. > >If we play one game, Fritz has a 50% chance, Junior a 50% chance. > >If we play one thousand games, Fritz has a 50% chance and Junior has a 50% >chance. > >Number of games is not relevant when they are so closely matched. I guess that the number of games is relevant and if the number of games is bigger the better learner is going to win and it means probably that Fritz is going to win after many games because Fritz has a bigger book so it is more easy for it to learn to go for lines that the opponent does not understand. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.