Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 10:43:11 04/13/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 1998 at 13:20:44, Mats Winther wrote: >We live in the positional era of chess when "good chess" is >defined as positionally refined chess. Then it is obvious that >Fritz5 plays less good chess than certain others (drawn from a >large amount of games). >But I take it that you regard tactical trickery as "good chess" too? >But isn't it better to use the traditional definition of "good chess". If you buy a chess program and use it, good chess is whatever amuses you. For purposes of the SSDF list, good chess is what gets a program a "1" instead of a "1/2" or a "0". bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.