Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:33:42 05/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2001 at 15:02:31, Wayne Lowrance wrote: > >Okey but the strength of the opponent is not given in the games I play at blitz. >They are games played mostly with a friend in Australia. My question was >regarding these playing conditions, mainly opponent Paramater no specified. >> It would be better to use the "rating" command to set this properly, but the default is "equal" which is not bad. Crafty _still_ factors in search depth which means blitz scores affect learning less than long games. > >No the books are not small and tiny. Kaput was just slang for " the lines will >not be generally selected" because of the red flag (Fritz book for example). > >I wonder if book learning is a good thing when blitz and long time contlrols are >plaqyed. It is _more_ effective against a single opponent, regardless of the time control used... It is best at a constant time control of course. Mixing opponents (if one or more is a computer it is even worse) is not as clean, mixing time controls and opponents is even worse.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.