Author: Heiner Marxen
Date: 09:26:43 05/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2001 at 17:48:03, Paul wrote: >On May 07, 2001 at 16:23:20, leonid wrote: > >>Second is almost the same position but contain slight genetical modification. It >>expect from you more brute force in order to reach the same result. >> >>[D]Qn1q1nQ1/1QNbNQ2/1qqkqq2/1QrqrQ2/1q1N1q2/3q4/3b4/Q2K2Q1 w - - > >Mate in 11 in half an hour, don't know the exact time, as the job ran in the >background, the solution looks a bit like the unlocking of a safe ... nice :): > >29:57 WM11 09 Ne8+ Qxe8 Nc8+ Qexc8 Qgxf8+ Qfe7 Q7xe7+ Qxe7 Qaxb8+ Qbc7 Qgg6+ Re6 >Q8xc7+ Q8xc7 Qxc7+ Qxc7 Qaa6+ Bc6 Qgxe6+ Qxe6 Qxe6# Chest says "No solution in 10 moves" after 2.7 hours (K7/600, 350MB hash). The effective branching factor appears to be around 6, so I quit here. Hey Paul, Pretz did it again! :-)) Heiner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.