Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 21:16:59 05/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
I see 93 posts with "big-o" in the title now. That's getting to be too many, if this is just a general computer science topic. bruce On May 09, 2001 at 22:48:55, Christophe Theron wrote: >On May 09, 2001 at 19:09:53, liam hearns wrote: > >>a am new to this interesting site and find it awfully good,but i do think th"big >>O people"should spare a deal of us the thedium of their wonderful >>discoveries,marvellous as i am sure they are,by creating their own little site >>for big O people.i do not wish to insult you chaps but you do tend to gyrate on >>the nerves at times.having made this point,hopefully not offending you chaps i >>do think that the information supplied by the majority is really jolly >>good.Charles A.Pentigrue. > > > >For me off topic discussions like this one are OK for the simple reason that the >people taking part to it are known as regular contributors to computer chess. > >I don't mind off topic discussions as this one for this reason, and also because >I know it won't last long. The people know it's off topic, they are known as >reasonable posters, and they will moderate themselves. > >I do not see this place as Computer Chess Club only but as a place where people >mostly interested in computer chess meet everyday and talk with each other. They >talk mostly about computer chess, but sometimes it is not about chess. That's >what happens in any club anyway... > >I would find it extremely strange, if I want to talk about O(n) with Dann, to >have to go somewhere else. Assuming it does not last for 3 months of course. > > > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.