Author: stuart taylor
Date: 02:29:00 05/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2001 at 04:04:20, Jouni Uski wrote: >On May 09, 2001 at 11:44:11, Jason Williamson wrote: > >>On May 09, 2001 at 11:30:02, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>On May 09, 2001 at 05:23:33, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>On May 09, 2001 at 05:16:00, stuart taylor wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 08, 2001 at 14:42:36, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 08, 2001 at 14:25:51, Harald Faber wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On May 08, 2001 at 13:01:22, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>[White "SOS K6-2 450 128MB"] >>>>>>>>[Black "CM8000 K6-2 450 128MB"] >>>>>>>>[WhiteElo "2524"] >>>>>>>>[BlackElo "2500"] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Based on the 24-16 from 2500 against 2524, which performance does that mean? >>>>>>2604 based on the linear formula that is close to the right formula. >>>>>> >>>>>>2524+400*(24-16)/(24+16)=2524+80=2604 >>>>>> >>>>>>Uri >>>>> >>>>>What's this? >>>>>Wasn't SSDF doing everything minuus 100? (So 2604 would be, you guessed it-2504) >>>>>S.Taylor >>>> >>>>? What are You meaning? Level of SSDF ratings were lowered by 100 after >>>>Carson's human-computer list last year. So no need to refer anymore. >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>What exactly was done? >>> >>>Was it a one-time thing, that they just came along and suddenly decided >>>arbitrarily to take down 100 from all existing elo ratings, and since then they >>>calculate according to those lowered ratings? >>> >>> And if so, they might do it again when it again gets too high? >>>S.Taylor >> >>As far as I know it was a one time affair. > >Previously it has done many times in 80s and 90s. But at least once level >was raised! > >Jouni I think I'm beginning to understand it a bit better now. But, there's a difference if you take off 100 from 2700 and if you take it off from 2000. Am I wrong? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.