Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 07:40:30 05/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2001 at 14:38:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >FIRST, I promise not to talk about big-O any more (at least on the board). I >don't want to transform the place from the CCC board into the CCC 'bored' >;-) > >Here are two different estimates, which differ by a factor of 4 million: > >http://www.rostra.dk/louis/styr.html?nf=quant_11.html&titel=The%20Extension,%20Age%20and%20Mass%20of%20the%20Universe&fra=http://www.google.com/search?q=%22mass+of+the+universe%22&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&start=10&sa=N >1.6x10^60 kg > >http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Articles/3-2/max-final.htm >7x10^53 kg > >Probably the differences are realted to esimates of how much dark matter there >is. > >Taking the high figure, in grams it is 1.6x10^63g >That would give 1.6x10^63 * 6.023x10^23 = 9.6368e86 elementary particles. Do you believe in everything you find on the net? Ralf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.