Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:54:04 05/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2001 at 09:47:17, Joshua Lee wrote: >Kasparov,G - Comp Deep Blue Game 6 > >[D] rbr5/1p1q1p1k/pPP1pBp1/P2pP2p/3Q3P/6P1/4RP2/2R3K1 b - - 0 1 > >I've looked at this position every so often and wonder how come no program wants >to play pawn takes? I have looked at the analyzed game and either way Black is >lost much earlier. This i believe can only show how far programs are away from >being on this level as some people have made the arguement of "Well if this >program could search that many nodes or more" I think i asked about this as well >but this should clearly show that even if your computer searched twice as many >nodes as Deep Blue or even Deeper Blue it may find deeper tactics but it is >still looking at the position and evaluating it differently and not as well. The >same goes for any of us Compared to a GM or IM they Think about each position >Differently than we do. One obvious reason is it gives white a protected passed pawn on the 6th rank. Another is there are obvious tactical problems after bxc6. Qc5 is one issue to deal with. Rec2 is another... Etc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.