Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 08:50:52 05/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2001 at 11:30:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 11, 2001 at 10:40:24, Roland Pfister wrote: > >>I had Patzer run over night with 16 minutes per position >>on a Piii-450, 32MB Hash. > ><snipped> >>14.Nxc4? 0 10:25 > >I am surprised that chess programs have problem with this easy tactical problem. >Even TSCP is faster in avoiding Nxc4 > >Hiarcs also has problem in this position and if I give it all the game it can >need a long time to avoid Nxc4(4 minutes on PIII800 with 64 Mbytes hash) That's peculiar. On my K6/450 64 MB hash, Hiarcs 7.32 needs about 50 secs to switch to Nc6; still a rather long time. Uli > >How much time does patzer need to see that 14.Nxc4 is a losing move? >If almost all the 10:25 were used to get a score for a better move like in >Hiarcs's case than it seems that something is wrong in your move ordering or >maybe patzer does too many extensions so it cannot get a score for another move >in a short time. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.