Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:13:23 05/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2001 at 16:04:40, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 11, 2001 at 15:10:30, Chris Taylor wrote: > >>I ran this 6 ply tournament. On a PIII 733, and used Nunn Test, then all play >>all. >>It was a collection of Chessbase/Fritz compatable programs. >>I was curious to see what would happen? I used ELOStat version 1.1b by >>Frank Schubert to analyse the results. >>What has suprised me is the result of Hiarcs, version 6 and 7.32.... > > >I do not see a reason to be surprised. >It is known that hiarcs can see deeper than the opponents at the same depth >because it does more extensions. > >I believe that Junior6 can also get a very good result if you add it to your >tournament. I believe Junior will get crushed. Remember that a "ply" to junior is not the same as a ply to everyone else. 6 plies to junior should compare to 3 normal plies for most programs... That would lead to trouble... > >Junior is supposed to get better result if you increase the depthes. >I am not sure if it can win at 6 plies but I am almost sure that Junior is going >to win your tournament if you do fixed depth of 9 plies. I don't think it will have a chance. It will be doing (vs say fritz) about 1/2 the depth. That is too big a handicap... > >If you do a tournament at 1,2 or 3 plies then Junior has no chance against >hiarcs. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.